12 Years a Slave

Turner prize winning director Steve McQueen’s third picture deals with the harsh realities of slavery through the true story of Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor) who is betrayed and sold into slavery in 1840s America.

db6bfb2c06aaa9a8c4308d93ab273dba

As with McQueen’s previous films, Shame and Hunger, he prefers to rely on brutally realistic depictions of shocking human tales to intricate plots or detailed character studies. Ejiofor is brilliant as Solomon, but more of this film’s visceral power comes from showing the full, graphic detail of slavery than from Solomon’s journey. This isn’t to say his story isn’t compelling, but it’s the conditions he both sees and is a part of that are the focus.

The all-star cast are very good, with Michael Fassbender managing to give the best performance of the film. It’s slightly distracting that even minor roles are filled by A listers, particularly Paul Giamatti’s part, in spite of being very well played. There’s a slight sense that a lot of actors were keen to be attached to the important film about slavery.

Absolutely nothing is shied away from here as McQueen has scene after scene of hanging, whipping and beating. Scarcely ten minutes goes by without a wince-inducing display of depravity. Where last year’s Django Unchained was incredibly violent, it was done in a very cinematic way and was a part of a blood-soaked revenge film. But 12 Years A Slave, as a far more gritty and realistic drama, is more often in the hard to watch territory, and never feels like it’s using real life horror to legitimize a desire to see violence. McQueen makes sure to show how common the violence against slaves was, with several protracted torture scenes taking place against a background of slaves going about their business.

His aim here is simple: to present the horror of American slavery in a way never seen on film before, and in this he succeeds. He also once again shows himself to be a director who can punch above his weight in terms of making a relatively small budget (a fifth of Django‘s) go a long way. Shot in just seven weeks with two cameras, 12 Years looks on a par with many pricier films.

But in spite of the undeniable quality of this film, it doesn’t feel like the usual Oscar bait. The honesty with which McQueen engages with his subject matter is daring, bold, and challenging to the audience. It’s an important film that will take you out of your comfort zone, and that can only be a good thing.

Advertisements

3 responses to “12 Years a Slave

  1. Pingback: The Birth of a Nation (2016) | Screen Goblin·

  2. Pingback: A Spike Lee Joint: BlacKkKlansman | Screen Goblin·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s